> So we’ve purchased a plot of vacant land on the border and retained a law firm specializing in eminent domain to make it as time-consuming and expensive as possible for the wall to get built.
Also, CAH founder has said in interviews in the past that:
> What I see getting results are back-to-basics material engagement with politics, like showing up at a Congress member’s office, calling, going to a protest. I think that’s more valuable than all of our clever liberal comedy right now. [0]
This is their way to give Americans a way to do an action with political weight and to funnel their marketing/comedic abilities into political action.
Will it stop the wall? No. Will it slow it down and make it a pain for the Trump administration? Yes. This is the equivalent of filibustering for normal citizens. Is it a way to do a political action? Yes
[0] https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/2/9/14532050/cards-against-...
I assume the government would just have the judge bundle all the cases together. It’s a pretty obvious ploy and it seems like making the government litigate it 1000x would be unnecessarily burdensome.
Wouldn’t their cases probably end up along with all the other cases you’d see from other ‘real’ landowners?
That was last years campaign.... Whatever they do it can't be more wasteful than last years.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/nov/28/cards-aga...