If we'd be talking paperclips vs paperclips would that be morally similar? Or is the monetary value of houses somehow large enough to justify a similarity to human lives?
And then there are all the "houses" built from salvaged materials in poor countries. Not sure if you'd want to count those. A person living in such a structure would still be considered homeless in many places.
It would be more accurate to say 'People are more emotionally attached to people than houses'.
Even so, none of those things matter (photos, computer files, etc) when you balance them with a human life.
Maybe only to the people involved, but it's likely that a fairly accurate dollar value could still be assigned to the loss.