On one hand it makes sense, but on the other hand, it could be seen as a diversification into real estate. If instead of personally buying the Bitcoin and house, I bought shares of "moduspol mutual fund", and then that mutual fund bought the Bitcoin and diversified into part of my house, I presumably wouldn't be taxed until I sold my shares in "moduspol mutual fund."
But it's a good problem to have, and probably not worth (legal) avoidance at smaller (< $1 million) values.
Do normal mutual funds pay capital gains taxes as the things they invest other people's money in are changed?
Yep! Tax efficiency of a mutual fund is quite an important factor to look at for your overall expenses as well. It's a large reason actively managed funds don't do as well as simple market-wide ETFs.
You bought Bitcoin at $1 and sell at $8000 to pay for a house, you need to declare income of $7999 for each Bitcoin at the end of the year or else...
If there is, it sucks because you're getting hit doubly for taxes on the item you're paying and the capital gains you'd be taking.
I'm almost certain that all countries have a catch all phrase to include any gains /income.
Would you be charged capital gains taxes if you wanted to make a straight-trade of real estate properties, or would there need to be a symbolic changing-hands of money on paper, and thus taxed on each side?
I can't claim to be trading real estate properties, or even buying and selling them (long live Toronto real estate market...) so I have no idea. I know it's a weird scenario, but just in an attempt to find an analogue — anybody?
edit: This question was an attempt to create a more relatable analogue scenario for a BTC <> Real Estate transaction. Thanks for the info.
In the United States there's something called a 1031 exchange that allows the deferral of capital gains recognition on a sale of one asset and the purchase of a similar one under some circumstances. But in the case of real estate in can only be used for investment properties not owner occupied residences.