It's an emotional safety net, yes. But in certain tragic circonstances it could mean the difference between life and death.
It's an emotional safety net, yes. But in certain tragic circonstances it could mean the difference between life and death.
How many parents do you think would accept a decision by their children not to use this? Your logic is the logic of police states: it's not to hurt you, it's for your own good, so why do you need privacy anyways?
Whatever the motivations of the authors, they are marketing their product to the unreasonable paranoia of parents (our society is actually really safe, people) and the effect of this software will be to make the lives of many children worse.
I'm not debating whether this product is good or bad. I'm simply arguing that its value proposition was misunderstood.
You have strong opinions about what parents should or should not do - fine. And strong opinions about the value of privacy - still fine. But you're picking the wrong person to disagree with.
You're just hoping that the battery of the device doesn't dry, or that the bad guys don't toss it away.