Bitcoin is not much of an anonymous platform. And anyone using it expecting anonymity is bound to end up disappointed.
The current spin that passes my twitter timeline is that it is state independent. Technically it is, but the sense it conveys is 'out of the reach of governments'. (c.f. "Prince Ibn so-and-so should have put his money is bitcoins. haha".)
It is always helpful to take the old history books out of the dusty shelves and read up on e.g. The Opium Wars to have a 'better' understanding on the er 'softer' aspects of "money".