Nicholas Negroponte: The Physical Book Is Dead In 5 Years
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
Dead to me is there is no market at all, dead is no bookshops in shopping centres. It could happen, I just don't see it, from my viewpoint public perception is that they are a great addition but not a replacement.
Sure older people like to sniff paper and are somewhat sentimental about printed books. Hell, even I like to touch printed book with a nice cover. But that's just an illusion and the truth is that printed books do not add anything (and maybe even subtract) from the reading experience.
Also when I buy a book and have finished it, I sometimes lend it out or even give it to a charity/reused book store. In turn its very nice to go into those shops and buy a book for 10 pence that was printed in 1979!
But electronic readers have a long way to go before they're useful for other types of books. A textbook or reference where you might constantly flip around the book would need better navigation or a way to use multiple synchronized displays to view a book.
Art / coffee table books need a better display and physical experience. In the future I can see something like a leather-cased super-sized iPad sitting on stuffy coffee tables, loaded with amazing visuals.
Kids books still need a cheaper, sturdier reader and color. Electronic readers can never replicate books with popups and textures, but the sound, video and interactivity they can offer could blow that away. I don't think electronic books can ever really replace coloring books for kids, but they should be able to replace workbooks.
I can share physical books, give them away when I'm done or have a yard sale with my library. What's the resale market like for ebooks ?
I can have multiple books spread in multiple rooms / places or even compare two side by side. If I forget a book while visiting my parent's it's no biggie. If I forget my Kindle I can't read anything else until I get it back.
The big advantage of ebooks is that they weigh nothing, so moving my entire collection to a different city doesn't involve the movers. Also, I don't have to wait for some rare book to physically get to my bookstore, I can just download it (although retailers might still try to limit this artificially with something like DVD regions, etc).
So I don't see ebooks entirely replacing my books any time soon.
How do you envision this scenario 50 years from now? Or even 20? Do you hand down your old dusty Kindle to your grandkids?
(Then again, if there's information overload already in 2010, I doubt that kids in the future will go around looking for more things to read...)
So don't say dead. As a reader, I hope paper books are always available. They are much more enjoyable to read. Maybe it's just because I spend so much time on a computer, but it's nice to read something without a device attached.
A paper book is a real thing. It's crafted. E-books seem to have many more typos and bugs. The only bugs in paper books are the kind with legs. Paper books have a user interface that does exactly what you intend: turn the page, insert a bookmark, make a highlight if that's your thing. With the kindle I always have to worry about if it thinks I mean what I think I mean when I press the back button. E-books are based on software, and software's natural state is to suck. I don't have to worry about my codices running out of power.
Also, devices are expensive. I don't have to worry about most codices getting stolen if I take them out in public. I have to be careful with my Kindle. When we have cheap, disposable e-readers, paper books might be in danger, but until then I think they're fine.
These shifts tend to take longer than most pundits say. I could see 8-10 years being a more likely estimate.
I can believe that ebook sales will soon surpass physical book sales. I got the Kindle app installed on my iPad & I've spent more on books in a few weeks than I previously did in a whole year combined.
Better display. Higher resolution, color fidelity, reflective or responsive/respective of ambient light levels.
A screen that can simultaneously display enough pages/books to occupy/correspond to my immediate, working memory (5-7, maybe a few more for the young/bright).
Immediate responsiveness and a graphical paradigm that need not seek to exactly mimic a real world setting, yet sufficiently replicates and triggers my sense of spacial orientation to take advantage of same (I left the book with that reference face down on the chair, and the other reference I need is at the 3rd or 4th bookmark in the one with the green cover.)
Electronic/automated search and discovery.
Real ownership (no magic DRM "disappearances") including the ability to transfer (including lending) at will.
Longer term, for especially solo consumption of electronic media, I think we're looking at heads up, imaging glasses and contacts. Until they start installing the sockets in our craniums.
Maybe physical book and electronic book will merge in something new that is not defined. Maybe it will be a luxury to own some books (it's already the case in many countries) or to have a "decent" bookshelf. I don't know. The only thing I know, until now, is the easiness to share books with your neighbors or resell or swap them. With electronic books, we are still far away except on planets like "Library Genesis".
The paper book has its problems. A lot of those printed from the late 1800s on used acid-pulped paper, which become brittle and disintegrates. On the other hand one has to wonder about electronic publishers commitment to maintaining usable formats.