The reason that Postgres can't kill Oracle, it's not the technology
techrepublic.com
techrepublic.com
Not saying that MSSQL is any better than Oracle, or Postgres for that matter.
The article touches on this, but it’s a factor of new companies eventually growing up without needing Oracle. That could take 50 years.
That being said, an org should foster open-source RDBMS for new projects that don't need heavy data-sharing with Oracle instances, and slowly expand. For one, Oracle sales-people will give you better deals if they know you are nurturing alternatives within. It's better if Oracle has you by one nut instead of two.
Any truth to that?
Maybe they were meaning within some (unknown to us) budget? That'd make more sense.