Eric Schmidt calls for "a complete lack of anonymity"

Um. No. Schmidt demanded nothing. Quoting the article:

He says the only way to manage issues—like misuse of technology by people with bad intentions—is much greater transparency and a complete lack of anonymity. Schmidt says true anonymity on the Internet is dangerous.

So he makes an observation and an opinion. That is not a demand.

He might believe that, he might make the demand at some point. Or he might not. But he did not do so here.

Did you even read the article? Please tell me how you arrived at your conclusion and why you choose to share it?