Linux Is A Time Killer
mostlymaths.net
mostlymaths.net
I run quite a variety of headless servers. In almost every case, it is easier to setup and maintain an Linux box than a Windows box. Almost every software package I need is a command away. And if I were doing this on Windows, I would still have to mess around configuring the software I installed, so there is no gain there.
One command, and all security patches are installed and running - live, and without re-configuring a thing. The only exception is a kernel upgrade, which requires a reboot, but otherwise is trouble-free.
Plus, when things break, it is so much easier to get configs transferred and running on a new Linux box, than on Windows. Re-install the software. Restore DBs. Restore configs. You're good. To a degree this is possible on Windows, but it is a lot harder because there are so many black boxes, binary configs, registry keys, etc.
What does it have common with your situation? Sometimes shit happens, things go wrong and there is some lurking bug that is hard to duplicate. You wasted few minutes of your time editing xorg.conf. I wasted few minutes rebooting and holding breath. Neither it does make any system bad, nor is it any ground for generalizations. Just hard to find bug.
Servers and Embedded Devices it's one of the easier alternatives.
I've also had lots of weird hardware configuration things with Windows, especially when upgrading from one major release of Windows to another, so I'm not sure that you can say it's a Linux thing.
It wasn't meant to be a Linux thing. It happens with every operating system. But with Linux, you have so much freedom you can get trapped by it trying to solve it all.
Windows always gave me a lof of headaches for absolutely no reason.
Last night , only getting local connection .... why ? And explorer.exe just decided to crash up on me everytime i opened the panel.
Fresh install .... crap win