The market tells you what's interesting and innovative

The market thinks that opium is interesting and innovative.

A bunch of analogies an argument does not make

Thanks HN commenters for bringing me back to solid ground. That was rough.

So you’re an “explorer” that’s “burning” a “runway” who needs to choose what to “expand”.

Reading this piece made me dizzy trying to unpack all of the stretched analogies.

I think their "throw stuff against the wall and see what sticks" tweet was way at the low end of the impression graph so they changed tactics and got themselves a HN frontpage article.

Now the question is how to monetize mixed analogies since that is apparently what the market wants. Maybe crypto-analogy kitties or something?

Was this article written by a Markov chain? It’s nonsensical.

Facebook AI most likely then :)

I'm wondering. I had to give up reading it because it's so cluttered and unintelligible it was actually making me anxious. What an absolutely ridiculous piece.

author is think-piecing really hard.