The linked article lays out precisely what "the fuss" is about.
And it uses Google's own prior statements about Net Neutrality as a concise critique of the most objectionable parts of the Verizon agreement.
And it uses Google's own prior statements about Net Neutrality as a concise critique of the most objectionable parts of the Verizon agreement.
The problem lies in the commitments Google appears to be willing to make. The compromises that Google have laid out are clearly not a worst case scenario, but I personally hope for a better policy than "it could be worse" to emerge from this discussion.
The entire article is nothing but distinguishing what Google wants from what it settled for.