Hacker News Reader

> Respectfully, what drives people to post tulip and dot-com bubble comparisons on literally every cryptocurrency / blockchain post?

See the story above.

> And a few months ago. And in 2016, and 2014, and 2012.

Nothing changed other than paper gains increased.

> Nothing changed other than paper gains increased.

Is this implying that cryptocurrencies have not evolved over that time period? I think you know that this is false.

Let see:

1. they are slower

2. it is more difficult to cash them out

Looks like utility decreased.