One significant task for a future psychology of optimal functioning is to deemphasize individual freedom and to determine which cultural constraints are necessary for people to live meaningful and satisfying lives.
The big leap here is the assumption that the allegedly necessary cultural constraints have to be determined from the outside. Liberal democracies, especially the USA, allow overlapping cultural groups to provide such constraints along with the safety valve of exit -- e.g. the Amish can have their culture, but individuals who are sick of it can still survive as "mere" Americans.
Now it is true that nominally "liberal" regimes sometimes try to choke off these groups. E.g. it is very unlikely that a new group as outlandish as the Amish would be allowed to form. But if you don't like such burka-banning tendencies, please note that the problem is not too much freedom, but too much constraint.