There was a lot of dicking around with TI-83 calculators, and drawing graphs to solve equations, which frustrated me since I'd already mastered the symbolic manipulation to do it faster and more easily.
In fact you'll find more applications of calculus in statistics than statistics in calculus won't you? Seems the wrong way around to do statistics first.
Just seemed surprised that OP seemed to imply his high school offered only two courses... Algebra and calculus.
Mine offered algebra 1,2, stats 1,2 geometry, trigonometry, Calc 1 and 2.
Of course also pre algebra if you didnt take that in middle school...
Stats remained something of a blind spot.
From my experience, at least, my math education was astoundingly good. I went to a top 50 US university and immediately went into advanced math classes my freshman year and felt fine. The problem, though, is that I followed the "honors student" curriculum. The "regulars students" curriculum didn't include advanced algebra, calc, or stats, and the quality of geom/trig/algebra education that was included wasn't that great.
Another problem is that this was just my experience in Texas. Other states have different curriculums, which makes the whole exercise of saying "education in the US is ____" very difficult.
I'm grateful of my math teacher for both those years for not reprimanding me for my brashness and encouraging me to solve number puzzles (one of those 0-9 tile sudoku-like things with math equations on laminated paper) for the rest of the period every time. RIP I was lucky to have you.