Hacker News Reader

Comment by joaodlf | Hacker News Reader

Way too negative.

I have been using uBlock Origin for years and it's one of those things that just works. Turning it off in those rare moments it needs to be off is a bleak reminder of the state of the internet. Why would I want to go through the hassle of managing all of this work by myself?

A massive THANK YOU to the individuals behind uBlock - You literally make the internet tolerable for me.

View on HN

I don't know why you call it negative, I call it realistic.

It's like putting all _caught_ pedofiles in a jail, and then saying children can roam the streets free and in safety...

It might be realistic to whitelist egress on a production server, but certainly not at my mother’s house.

> I don't know why you call it negative, I call it realistic.

Negativity usually bills itself as realism, but that doesn't make it so.

It might be realistic for you, or me or anyone in here, but it definitely isn't realistic for the average user. And it's them we try to protect by blocking ads. Technical savvy people have an armada of options at their disposal, for example we could just block JavaScript. But the average Joe relies heavily on ad blockers for a smoother and safer experience browsing the web. You can't expect non technical users to do any of the things you propose.

You're arguing against yourself. They do put all caught pedophiles in jail, and it's extremely safe for children to roam the streets from a pedophile point of view (but very risky from a car accident point of view).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com