Hacker News Reader

So people can leverage the shitty design of your lock to steal goods? And it's okay because the lock is functioning as it should? It shows how deeply embedded the idea of maintaining proper design and processes is over, going back to the drawing board and designing a secure lock.

View on HN

It's an interesting debate. But it's clear in the statement they provided, that they are laser focused on design above all else.

Literally, prioritize proper design over security and maybe even performance in some cases. Which is interesting because you'd figure at some point, the customer would be considered in the design.

Like are Intel chips designed by robots or something?

So people can leverage the shitty design of your lock to steal goods? And it's okay because the lock is functioning as it should?

That's how Master Lock stays in business.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com