In Antarctic dry valleys, early signs of climate change-induced shifts in soil
phys.org
phys.org
20 years, is but a blink of an eye. It takes us back to 1997 only. What was the longer term trend ? How would they know if we started in a local maximum, or how often populations rebound ?
I complain that we barely have enough arctic and antarctic satellite samples and we have those from 1979.
So any decline of anything is linked to climate change automatically ?? That doesn't follow at all.
My opinion is informed by facts such as:
This study is only 20 years of a multicentury phenomena, how do we know what is the "appropriate" amount of nematodes ? Is less than 20 years ago a bad thing or a complete irrelevance ?