Induction of self awareness in dreams through low current stimulation (2014)
nature.com
nature.com
Please also regard the methodological problems that are posed by the study http://neurocritic.blogspot.nl/2014/05/does-gamma-tacs-reall... and that they only used 3 subjects. Furthermore they are not willing to share their data with other scientists. However, support comes from another group: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810013...
By definition a person knows when they are having a lucid dream or not. If you will not trust their self report of that info there is no reason to trust anything else they report about the dream either. This scale is pointless for the purpose of identifying lucid dreaming.
Where is the result: "% of trials that the person reports lucid dreaming"? Perhaps that is in supplementary figure 1 where they show "Nb. of dreams rated as lucid"? But what does it mean to "rate as lucid"?
For this paper I see this is based on the scale:
"Lucidity was assumed when subjects reported elevated ratings (>mean + 2 s.e.) on either or both of the LuCiD scale factors insight and dissociation."
Going back to their earlier paper about creating the LuCiD scale all I find is this:
"Dreams were treated as lucid dreams if they were rated as such by the participants." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23220345
Do they? I mean, the qualia of "I'm having a lucid dream" might not have 100% overlap with the fact of having a lucid dream.
Certain drugs can give people something they will describe as "a feeling of being very sure about things" without that feeling having any particular referent—whatever they think about, they tend to describe experiencing an "epiphany" about. (The subset of people who think tend to frame things through a lens of religious faith tend to describe this drug experience as a "religious experience", a "contact with the divine." Mostly, it seems, because they direct their attention to their religious beliefs, and end up having a feeling of sureness about those, while other trippy things are happening.)
I wouldn't find it hard to believe that there is a thing you can do to the brain that makes it believe you are in conscious control of affecting the world you are sensorily experiencing. By itself, this would just make you experience dreaming as normal, but with a sensation that whatever you're doing in the dream—and however the dream is proceeding—it was your choice for you to do those things, and for the dream to proceed in that fashion. Without actual control of the dream, this would likely cause ego-dystonic thoughts: questioning why you directed the dream to go the way it did, because it seems so out-of-line with your normal waking desires.
I cover this objection in the next sentence:
>"If you will not trust their self report of that info there is no reason to trust anything else they report about the dream either."
If you don't trust the self report of such basic aspects of the dream, why would you believe anything they say about it at all? Either way, the "LuCiD" scale they came up with is unhelpful for identifying lucid dreaming.
In dreams, neither of these are true: "you" don't behave the way you'd expect of your waking self, and the things "you" do don't result in what you'd expect out of the real world.
That is: you can fly in a dream; you can't fly in real life. But if you could fly in real life, you probably would. Therefore, it isn't shocking to "watch yourself" decide to fly, if flying is obviously an option.
Consider, by contrast, ripping your own limbs off. Perfectly possible in reality, but nobody does it. If you did it in a dream, you'd wonder why "you" wanted to do that. It wouldn't make sense for you to make that decision, so probably "you" aren't you at the moment.
You might try some stuff, e.g. stepping off a cliff in order to fly, only if you're really quite sure you're in a dream. But "being sure you're in a dream" means "being sure your actions have no long-term consequences in reality", which allows many more things to be ego-syntonic.
Rarely - you can recapture that very different way of being while awake and have skills you never had before.
> Previously to sleeping, volunteers like Worsley agreed on preset eye movements they would perform once they achieved lucidity in their dreams, which La Berge could record in the lab.
Source: http://dreamherbs.com/eminent-dreamers/stephen-laberge/
It does not work when I cant get any images to form because I am not tired or distracted. It also requires a fair amount of attention to redirect yourself to 'keep looking'. Its easy to drift off and do normal sleep.
When focusing on these for a while, and trying to force my mind to make sense of it, eventually these blobs turn into oddly abstract shapes with intricate patterns on them, that are very visible. I've never gone that far with it - very interesting.
EDIT: I had not heard of the Ganzfield effect before, although I was familiar with the phenomenon itself. It does seem like this a manifestation of what they're referring to. As a side note, in sensory deprivation situations you also become keenly aware of the sound of your heart beating and the sound of your blood circulating in your veins. It's very odd.
Two easy techniques -
1. Ask yourself continually through the day "Am I dreaming?", which primes you to become self-aware while dreaming.
2. Wake up two hours before you normally get up for 10 mins, then go back to sleep.
I also find that a Magnesium and Zinc vitamin tablet before bed assists with dream recall, however I have no science to back this up.
In fact, I know that I'm dreaming and that if I open my eyes (somehow separate from opening or closing my eyes in my dream) I will wake up. Sometimes I might shout or say something in my dream and I actually say it out loud and that wakes me up as well.
When I do it before bed, I often fall asleep before getting anywhere interesting. Napping works better for me because there is no pressure to get sleep. Maybe as I become better at this I'll have more success doing it before bed
I suspect this is because the conscious mind is slow and single threaded compared to the unconscious mind which is faster and multithreaded. In a dream where the mind is in control of both the experiencing 'self' and all aspects of the environment, this difference causes a real loss in fidelity.
Thus, I don't understand the obsession with lucid dreaming and I really don't understand why people would want to do it every time they dream.
What I came to learn is that expectations drive the dream. When not conscious of the dream, it's almost like those Google deep dream images. If our mind thinks something strange could happen, well then that's very likely to happen, and this reiterates and can converge on strange and fantastic mindscapes.
When we're aware of the dream, then our expectations become much more dry and realistic. Also, I think there is a difference between being lucid and being lucid and in control. Simply being lucid in a boring dream would not be so great.
However, being in control is wonderful. You get to explore and experiment with what is possible. One thing I'd enjoy doing is talking to someone to see what they'd say (not knowing what they would say while being aware that it was my brain coming up with what they were saying). Those were some of my most memorable dreams. Also, I've definitely have had dreams where I've maintained the richness and trippiness after become aware.
When it happens I start flying and fly and fly. It's one of the best, if not the best experience ever. I usually wake up having convinced myself I can actually fly, or at least escape gracity at will. It takes a while to get back to "reality".
What's so cool about lucid dreaming is, it feels exactly like reality (unlike, say, daydreaming). And you get to decide what happens and what do.
What's not to like.
For me this is a function of how many of my dreams I have been writing down. The more I work to remember my dreams, the richer and more detailed they appear. This is orthogonal to the dreams being lucid or not.
But then, I got how much dreaming contributes to creative problem solving. And decided not to mess with it.
Why not do that in lucid dreams? It's a common use-case. If you can't be as creative when you're lucid, then ask one of the NPCs in your dream to help.
"I am in a dream, I want to fly."
Turns out my body doesn't actually know how to fly and I woke myself up it seems, in the process of trying to take off.
I just made the decision to do things that I knew I could do, and it happened. I think I eventually even visited a Star Trek set. (Nerrrrrrd.)
Didn't really try to fly, I just changed the situation I was in from "I'm in a room," but I imagine that I could change it to "I'm in the air, and there's no gravity," without a shock sufficient to wake me up.
I've only managed it twice, myself, the first time I woke up because I was so surprised that I was aware in a dream. I want to try it again, so I can see what limits I have before I wake myself.
Dreams about falling are just reminders that in dreams you can fly.
It worked.Typically in my dreams it feels like normal life, except that for some reason I'm gullible to dream logic. If something strange happens and I try to make sense of it, a bad explanation--one that I wouldn't accept in real life--will perfectly satisfy my dreaming brain.
However, occasionally dream logic totally breaks down and I realize it's a dream. In that instant I gain full control. But it doesn't take long before the control slips away, forgetting the revelation that happened moments ago.
What about you? Are all of your dreams always lucid?
Sometimes there is some sort of realization of being in a dream but it's always at the moment I'm waking up.
I'm pretty jealous of people with lucid dreams, it must be fantastic.
It's crucial that in the time your body falls asleep, you don't make any voluntary movements (just as if you were to fall asleep normally). I've also read about a trick that you can help you stay mentally awake. You have to pretend as if you were tapping with your index and middle finger, but only just so that they don't actually move. This also helps you realize when your body falls asleep. I'd say WBTB (Wake back to bed) is the most reliable method for lucid dreams.
Same here, very well worded. That's the case for me in maybe 3/4 dreams. The more emotionally intense ones have that "now" feeling though.
Search online for some practices to help induce lucid dreams. There are things that could help. For example, creating a habit throughout the day to check if you're dreaming. e.g. look in the mirror and ask if it's a dream, or look at a clock and ask if its a dream.
If you create this habit in normal life, the idea is that it will carry over to your dreams. Just realizing a dream is a dream should propel you into lucidity. Dreams rarely seem to get reflections and clocks right.
I always wonder how "real" do dreams feel for people who dream lucidly, but then I realize that it wouldn't matter for me. The level of realism, details, the feelings - are irrelevant, since it would only be a memory, at no point in time I would ever be experiencing it. It would be just a faint, happy, memory of something that didn't happen.
I researched a little and found this book, may be you find it interesting, so here it is:
Imagine you reading this paragraph at this moment, but in reality you are dreaming of it, it is not real.
How can you tell? can you even ask yourself that question at a moment like that? will it make sense to ask that question since you "think" you are awake?
As I recall it, the major problem was trying to decide which would be the one to go to work, and which would stay home, and whether making the obvious choice was sexist or not. The bodies were not identical. And they could have an argument of sorts. I eventually sent the "wrong" one to work, and I was disappointed when no one noticed that I was a different me that day. I spent most of my day at work playing video games at home.
Even just remembering this one makes my head hurt. Our brains are definitely not designed for that kind of multitasking.
While asleep - no sensation whatsoever just black. Essentially passed out. After waking up there is either no memory (i.e. the time is completely missing) or small fragments of a dream that are more memory than sensation.
IOT enabled (Blink the lights while exploring the underside)
Spotify integrated
Tinder enhanced
Facebook dreams comparability
Google drive flow (work in your dreams!)
Udemy stream (I know kung fu)
Tesla wheel dream (dream while you drive? / dream about your next car..?)
I didn't like Dreamfall. I didn't like what they did to April, and found the new characters uninteresting. Never played Dreamfall Chapters.
You can also breathe without an open airway, so the Valsalva maneuver does not work. As I need to do this several times during the day to relive underpressure due to my crap eustachian tubes, this is an immediate tell for me. Then I poke my finger through my palm, and usually get so excited about figuring out that I'm dreaming that I wake myself up. I've heard that you can spin around as though you were trying to make yourself dizzy to avoid waking, but it never seems to work for me.
"Alexa, what is the weather like in my dreamscape?"...
Pomodoro sleeping for a double win.
Also, get a watch or app with hourly beep and do a reality check. Mine is 3 things: (1) close eyes (2) pinch nose and try to breathe through it (3) check out my hands.
All 3 of these are weird in dreams & reliably indicate that I am dreaming.