Especially for high school kids (maybe 14-18 ish?). No one could possibly think that sending them to a school that starts at 7am is any way good for them. In our distract the high school starts at 7am and the small kids start at 9am. This makes no sense to me at all. (I'm not a kid complaining, I'm a parent)
Because of the way school and work schedules are structured, you're right that it can give you an edge to be a morning person (I'm fortunate enough to be one). However, waking up early doesn't make a night owl an early bird - it makes them tired. The fact that people are split along these lines makes it questionable to enforce schedules that suit part of the population but leave the remainder strained and underutilized.
I was always under the impression this staggered start rate among school tiers was because they all share the same buses. If they all started at the same time they would need ~3x as many buses and bus drivers.
https://www.westonschools.org/blog/2017/10/23/proposed-chang...
I suspect the problem is that teens just stay awake FAR LONGER than is advisable perhaps to maximize their free unstructured time at night and to minimize the crushing grind of the mornings?
I expect that if the school start time was shifted to 9am, the kids would just stay up until 5AM instead of only 3AM.
https://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/Childrenssleep/Pages/howmuchslee...
These days (I am 37 now), when I go to bed an hour later than usual, I will feel it all day. Might not be a huge deal, but I notice it.
Here's a summary of the issue: https://sleepfoundation.org/sleep-news/school-start-time-and...
Summary: your theory doesn't appear to be supported by data.