How does one formulate what constitutes a correct response to discovering a fallacy in an argument?
I know the conclusion isn't necessarily false, but I also have no reason for assuming it to be true - since there is no good argument to support it.
I know the conclusion isn't necessarily false, but I also have no reason for assuming it to be true - since there is no good argument to support it.
Though I think it is even better to weigh how much of the argument rests on the fallacious premise (or step) and then evaluate the argument sans fallacy.