Did you read the article? Not sure about you but I don't have to put my government issued ID on my kitchen knives.
Yes.
> Not sure about you but I don't have to put my government issued ID on my kitchen knives.
Neither do I. But that's because I love freedom.
What's the difference between ids on or for knives and ids on or for guns? It sounds ridiculous to us because our murders are by guns. But in china people kill each other with knives.
https://www.cnn.com/2014/03/01/world/asia/china-railway-atta...
Do you know what some people in the US want? Fingerprinted "smart" guns. More government surveillance/registry/etc of gun owners. What's the difference?
If people in china are killing each other with knives, doesn't "smart" knives or knife registry make sense just like a gun registry?
I guess all the folks in Xinjiang just don’t love freedom as much as you do.
Of course they do. Good god you completely missed my point.
Not sure if calling your own example ridiculous is a good argumentative tactic in short-form debates like this...
>because our murders are by guns
Sure, but a cleavers' main manufactured purpose isn't killing other human beings. The guns involved in mass shootings are made specifically for shooting people en mass.
>If people in china are killing each other with knives, doesn't "smart" knives or knife registry make sense just like a gun registry?
No. Even though the barrier for entry for making guns is getting lower and lower, they'll never ever approach the barrier for entry for making an edged weapon.
Add to that the social utility aspect that someone else mentioned. Firearms are explicitly designed to make it easy to hit a target with lead from far away, which just so happens to coincide with killing people in perhaps the most efficient way possible(barring weapons of mass destruction).