If an engineer isn't doing well on their 80% project, a 20% project might be frowned upon, that is true.
If an engineer isn't doing well on their 80% project, a 20% project might be frowned upon, that is true.
https://www.hrzone.com/lead/culture/why-did-google-abandon-2...:
> Why did Google abandon 20% time for innovation?
> In 2012 the firm began requiring engineers who wished to work on individual projects to run their proposals by their managers first. This was a significant change from the firm’s previous policy.
> In 2013 it was reported that managers had clamped down on staff taking ’20% time’ so as to avoid their teams falling behind in Google’s internal productivity rankings. Managers are judged on the productivity of their teams—Google has a highly developed internal analytics team that constantly measures all employees’ productivity—and so time spent on ’20% time’ projects would impact this.
2013 Google sounds like pretty much every other major company, in this area.
Sure if you can get everything expected of you done in 32 hours, you can spend the remaining 8 on something else.