No, but the Met did pay nearly half a million quid to avoid going into the question of whether an undercover policeman sleeping with his target constituted rape.
Why wouldn't you think that?
In fact, they are doing exactly that: "11 women (...) are currently suing the police after being tricked into having sexual relationships with men later revealed to be undercover officers (...)".
Especially when the "women targeted by undercover police officers" are not some hardened terrorists living undercover themselves (who'd avoid going to courts at all costs), but people e.g. belonging to some environmental activists group or some left wing protesters, etc.
Put this recent news in the light of the coverup over ministerial child sexual abuse in the UK .. now they've got a very significant means of getting themselves out of that particular pickle, eh boys?