Art, by definition should not be objectively evaluated. Art is inherently subjective - objectively great art would not be art, as it loses personal meaning.
Comrade Zhdanov would not put it better.
Perhaps you meant to compare the commentor above me to Zhdanov? His views seem diametrically opposed to what I said.
Right, the mania for 'politically correct' inspection of music, art, etc. went viral with Zhdanov, and even those who found the Soviets too authoritarian took it up with glee.
When was objective quality ever the most relevant metric in art? Why do you believe this is a trend?
The disturbing trend is people thinking objective criticism is possible, let alone desirable. Objective measurements of art literally do not exist.