still worth it
The catch here is that no customers of theirs were given a chance to do so voluntarily. They purposefully misled customers so even though it's nice you don't care, others who do fell into the trap. That's fucked up.
If your point is more generally that we shouldn't be able to just skim a ToS and give consent, what's your alternative that doesn't destroy the ability of online businesses to engage in these kinds of agreements?
Edit: I'm adding this here because I can't reply to the comment below me by s73v3r_ 26.
You in particular might not care, but there are a lot of people who feel like these businesses provide valuable services and don't mind being expected to actually be accountable for the things they agree to. If you don't like ToS businesses online, come up with an alternative. Otherwise, unless your plan is just to go on a tirade, you need to at least try to consider an alternative to outright destruction or your argument is going to lose all of its persuasive power when talking to people who do value these services.
Why should we care about preserving one of the worst business practices of recent times?
Ok, its 11 pages, which according to http://niram.org/read/ should take 32 minutes to read, can be updated at any time, and contains such language as
You agree to indemnify and hold MoviePass, its officers,
directors, shareholders, predecessors, successors in interest,
employees, agents, subsidiaries and affiliates, harmless from
any demands, loss, liability, claims or expenses (including
attorneys' fees), made against MoviePass by any third party
due to or arising out of or in connection with your use of the
MoviePass Service or Site.
MoviePass's obligations, if any, with regard to its products
and services are governed solely by the agreements pursuant
to which they are provided, and nothing on this Site should be
construed to alter such agreements.
When you go through a law degree you have several subjects dedicated to "learning how to read a legal document". If it just required high school literacy, why would you ask very intelligent people to go through a literacy course in university? Because there is more to reading a legal document (such as knowing precedents in contract law, how courts interpret certain conditions, what the agreement means in the context of any related laws, and so on) than just knowing what the words mean.