https://gist.github.com/ChrisPenner/c0b3f4feb054daa2f6370d2e...
https://gist.github.com/ChrisPenner/c958afbf6e7a763c188d8b83...
https://gist.github.com/ChrisPenner/c0b3f4feb054daa2f6370d2e...
https://gist.github.com/ChrisPenner/c958afbf6e7a763c188d8b83...
I mean, I personally don't care; I've always been a little weird. But it is funny to see technical preferences as a signaling mechanism.
Funny, that is, until it hits a certain point... http://www.wired.co.uk/article/chinese-government-social-cre...
Also avoiding downloading JS libraries bigger than Quake while on the go.
More like "disabled by default," actually. It's mostly ads/tracking, popovers, and other annoyances, and it's easy to selectively turn it back on where you really need it. This approach isn't for the general public yet.
This was one of the best quality of life decision in terms of web browsing I have ever made.
The vast majority of pages that I randomly access (e.g. from hacker news) are text based and usually work just fine without js. But the time until I can start reading is much faster (less jumping around of content) and I don't get the growth hackers modals shoven down my throat two paragraphs in. The pages I use regularly are usually white listed