Hacker News Reader

Comment by jessaustin | Hacker News Reader

If that's bad, what happens when the robocars get hacked?

Like we have botnets made out of thousands (millions?) of compromised computers, we could have entire fleets of compromised cars, rentable on the black market using cryptocurrency, that could be used to commit crimes (e.g. homicide) while keeping the killer anonymous.

Scary stuff. I hope these self-driving cars will be able and designed to work while completely offline, with no built-in way to ever connect to a network. But given the biggest player in the field seems to be Google, they'll probably be always connected in order to send data to the mothership and receive ads to show you.

Using these cars to commit homicide was actually one of the plot points in the second book of Three Body Problem trilogy by Liu Cixin. Very much recommended if you are into sci-fi.

Those books are interesting in that Liu seems to get away with seriously portraying narratives that would be out of bounds in the "approved" popular culture of the West. Murder by robocar is a minor example, but others include portrayal of the inherent weakness of societies in which men are effeminate and the superiority of leaving strategic decisions to military authorities. (I don't particularly agree with those propositions, but they are certainly present in the books.)

I'm half-way done with the last book in the trilogy and I am finding the assumptions and viewpoints of the world from a Chinese view quite interesting. The one that struck me most was how he presents humanities greatest strength over the technologically superior aliens is the human ability to conceal their true thoughts and the possibility of deception. Quite different from Christianity's high value placed on honesty.

The great stories of paganism and animism were composed by artists, and they all feature trickery and uncertainty. The Christian Bible has some of that (I like Job), but the majority was written by humorless unimaginative prudes. I suppose some of the Chinese philosophers are a little better than St. Paul, but mostly when they're being playful.

> receive ads to show you

I'm just envisioning a scenario where the car automatically pulls to the side of the highway, locks the doors and dishes you with a 15 second ad, and then the doors unlock and the journey resumes as normal.

Or just (virtually) replace billboards with personalized content

"I hope these self-driving cars will be able and designed to work while completely offline, with no built-in way to ever connect to a network."

Don't hold your breath about that. There will be a huge load of data ready to be sold to advertising companies just by listening what passengers talk about when passing near areas/stores/billboards/events etc.

Confused by the downvote here. This is a perfectly legitimate question, and indeed it should be asked more, not less, often.

This is stupid question. The answer is - the same as if someone will physically mess with your car.

Physical hacking can only happen to one car at a time.

What if someone hacks the assembly line for Ford?

What if someone put a bomb in your car or mess with your breaks?

Right, but what if someone could put a bomb in 100k cars or mess with 100k car's breaks remotely over the internet. A large enough quantitative change becomes a qualitative change.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com