Bankruptcy in general is shady though and no matter what, when it happens, somebody is getting screwed out of a lot of money... usually the debtors.
Bankruptcy in general is shady though and no matter what, when it happens, somebody is getting screwed out of a lot of money... usually the debtors.
Keep in mind, Toys R Us had some 20% of the online toy market. And without the debt hanging around their neck, they'd actually have funds to invest in competing.
They make the company pay them dividends while saddling the company with their debt.
"The debtors however get screwed even further... most if not all of them get absolutely nothing."
And yet, they keep lending to these vultures. I have no sympathy.
Yes that is true. Is the sum of dividends over X years >= the amount of equity wiped out in a Chapter 7 liquidation? Impossible to say... the company is private.
> They make
They didn't make them do anything. They bought the company... they can do what they want as owners. That's just how this game works.
Man I wish I knew the fine details of the books of a multi-billion dollar private equity firm like you do.
Toys R Us made a 10 year deal with Amazon to be the exclusuve toy seller in 1999, that had already fallen apart by 2005. Amazon was already the top online toy reteller by then. As far as debtors being "screwed", hopefully they are both diversified enough and demanded enough of a risk premium for them to at least break even on their entire portfolio of loans.
https://qz.com/1080389/a-dot-com-era-deal-with-amazon-marked...
Apple learned that lesson a decade ago. If you look at the post Steve Jobs Apple, they brought more in house - retail, chip design, software, and rumors are they are trying to bring screen design more in house. Anything else, they try desperately not to depend on one supplier - commoditizing their compliments. (https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/06/12/strategy-letter-v/)