Was this access to Zuck why the NYT silently changed their story to make Sandberg look less culpable yesterday?
It worries me.
It worries me.
https://twitter.com/alexstamos/status/975926737111367680 https://twitter.com/alexstamos/status/976175174314635264
You'd think the news sites would maybe be a little bit more transparent given all this fake news rabble, but they can't even bother to update with primary sources apparently...
"Losing a debate" and being "discouraged" are not mutually exclusive.
The story originally said that Stamos has clashed with Sandberg over addressing the Russia issue. The sentence has now been completely removed. They did't even print a retraction. This is truly disturbing and more than a little ironic considering the context. Shame on them.
https://lawandcrime.com/exclusive/facebook-forces-nyt-to-qui...
[edit] It had dropped a long way down https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16632743