Hacker News Reader

The very first thing that shows is the companies that are the least naughty.

This is a naughty list is it not? Suggest to please sort by naughtiest first.

We always sort by naughtiest first. Any services in particular you think have the wrong data?

Ah I see, I think it's a case of ambigious copy being misinterpreted by some of us:

"Tech Companies That Won't Delete Your Information Services with the highest scores have the worst policies"

I read this as 20 is worse than 1.

Maybe something along these lines, explicitly explaining 1 is the worse.

"Tech Companies That Won't Delete Your Information Services. Those with the highest rank have the worst policies. A rank of 1 is the worst offender"

I think this is somewhat a problem of English missing a term that unambiguously means "1 is highest".

Changed.