Record Set as India Produces 100 Billionth Unit of Renewable Energy in a Year
thewire.in
thewire.in
Edit: Wikipedia has them at 195,242 GWh in 2015 but that includes large-scale hydroelectric.
100,000 GWh = 100,000,000,000,000 (giga => x 10^9) which means it's actually the 100 trillionth unit.
And he repeats the mistake when saying "...and one hundred thousand million units of electricity has eleven zeros" - indeed it does but then 100000 million units is not 100000 G units.
EDIT: Actually I'm the one who got it wrong. Apparently, electrical "unit" here is kWh not Wh, TIL.
The decline in dam efficiency is not a new thing. Is it possible to remediate?
More on that here : https://bourrasque.info/articles/20180116-moulins-%C3%A0-ven... (in French though)
http://www.hellogrid.com.au/energy-exchange/1117/
As solar utility scale sites become more common (and they are), a cloud growth can wipe 100s of MW off the grid very quickly and the problem is it is very hard to tell how much will get wiped off and when (measured in minutes).
Gas will be in the mix for longer than other fossil fuels due to its reaction time but as storage becomes cheaper and gas more expensive, it will be used less and less IMO.
To illustrate, storage is already really cheap in practice thanks to Pumped-storage, we just have really sort supply of locations for such plants.
> Renewable is OK at producing Energy, which we don't really care about after a certain point.
Also, storage is never counted as part of renewable costs in articles promoting renewable.
Our habits around electricity use will also have to change as well but with vehicle to grid solutions starting to come online from car manufacturers like Nissan, I think electric cars will be part of the solution though one that will take 20-30 years to become a major player.
Cost of storage isn’t talked about for renewables usually because it isn’t needed to provide ~50%+ of usage, it’s the last 30% that will require storage of some kind for 100%. This will be doable for places near hydro but harder for places without.
At 100,000GWh till end of March FY means ~140GWh over the 12 hours at night assuming usage is flat over the day (which it isn’t). I think you’re right that a usage behaviour change would be make the storage problem more practical to address..
EDIT: Incorrect figures from article regarding usage over 12 hour period.
[From the article] For France, storage needs to be able to provide 55GW, which is 2.5 times bigger than the Three Gorges Dam, and way higher than the total hydro potential of France as a whole (which has one of the biggest in Europe). Controllable hydro is almost maxed out (or at least 80% maxed out) everywhere in Western Europe : remind it has always been the cheapest source of power since the beginning of electricity. We did all we could to harvest the most of it. The US is probably an exception among developed countries because it's enormous country with a tiny population in comparison. But yet, I'm not sure it's doable even in the US.
> I think electric cars will be part of the solution
[From the article] Even with Tesla Model X (which has the biggest battery currently) you'll need 260 millions car to provide enough storage for France, which is 6.5 times the number of cars in circulation there. If you take a more affordable car, you need 1 billion cars (25 times the existing total). Maybe storage will improve in the next decades, but I highly doubt we'll get batteries 25 times more efficient even in the next 20-30 years. We already know what progress we can expect for the next 10 years (it's already in the labs nowadays) and we are light-years away from that (we're talking about double digit percent improvements, not multiple times).
"Storage needs to provide 55GW" seems to come from peak consumption rate considering gross yearly generation was at 556TWh in 2014.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_sector_in_France
This seems to be assuming that there will be 0 generation and all must come from storage which is not really a something that will happen in practice and also over night (when all solar is at 0 generation) consumption is usually a lot lower than peak.
"Even with Tesla Model X (which has the biggest battery currently) you'll need 260 millions car to provide enough storage for France"
This is just strange figures considering that the Model X base model battery size is 75kWh. Why would France need 19.5 TWh of car based storage? Even at a peak of 55GW usage, this fleet of 260M Model X cars would power all of France for 2 weeks!
Realistically, vehicle to grid will only be a portion of storage and to get into the 90% renewable range only 12 hours of storage would be required which would be ~600GWh which even if all had to come from cars (overly expensive, not practical etc..) that would be <20 million Model X or ~30% of current cars on their roads (assuming owners would only allow their batteries to become 50% depleted).
Again, this is assuming 0 generation over night which with a lot of wind all over the country would be unlikely, AND peak load over night, which doesn't happen in practice.
Peek consumption in France is around 90 GW if we don't face exceptional weather conditions, but it has been as high as 102GW in 2012. sources [1]
> is not really a something that will happen in practice and also over night (when all solar is at 0 generation) consumption is usually a lot lower than peak.
In France the peak is in winter (due to electric heating) and the daily peak is around 7pm, at which time France is in the dark for 2 hours already (the sunset is around 5pm in winter). Then no solar production at this point. And there's been some days with wind power producing less than 5% of its capacity. At this point you really need a good backup, and my point is that the storage will never be enough.
> Why would France need 19.5 TWh of car based storage? Even at a peak of 55GW usage, this fleet of 260M Model X cars would power all of France for 2 weeks!
As I said earlier, peak is far from 55GW in winter. And the correct amount of storage needed is 26 TWh, it's calculated based on the actual wind and solar efficiency during 2017[2]. And you're right, what France needs two weeks of storage in winter, because that's how long episodes without wind lasted in 2017 (I'm not even taking historical records here, just the most recent year we have data about).
> Realistically, vehicle to grid will only be a portion of storage and to get into the 90% renewable range only 12 hours of storage would be required which would be ~600GWh which even if all had to come from cars (overly expensive, not practical etc..) that would be <20 million Model X or ~30% of current cars on their roads (assuming owners would only allow their batteries to become 50% depleted).
That's hand-wavy reasoning, but that doesn't resist the actual analysis I did when writing this article. It might be true for some country, but it surely doesn't work like that for France.
If you're curious, don't hesitate to have a look at the data and the calculation [2].
[1] : http://www.rte-france.com/fr/eco2mix/chiffres-cles
[2] : https://bourrasque.info/images/20180116-moulins-%C3%A0-vent/...
Thanks for the corrections around usage as well as the spreadsheet full of data!
50 times for solar is quite a lot (~350GW installed rooftop or does it include solar parks?), not practical for solar alone, at least not in the next 20 years.
I'm not sure about France, but in other parts of the world, most of the solar power generation has been added in the last 5 or so years I remain optimistic that installation rates will continue to grow, but your data has shown me that for locations with heavy heating requirements, aiming for 100% renewable anytime soon is just not practical.
Thanks again for the spreadsheet, I work with solar forecasting (including for Europe!), we have only started modeling for storage and would be very interested where the hourly solar generation on the grid came from and other work you've done in this area. My email is [darren at solcast dot com dot au].