Trump is a skilled brand marketer; beyond that there is a dearth of evidence.
> and is a president of the US of A after taking up politics as a hobby 1.5 years before the election
Trump's first Presidential effort, which was quickly abandoned (notionally because he didn't want to be associated with certain other candidates in that race), was in 2000, when he sought the Reform Party nomination. He was involved in politics before that, and had fairly open Presidential aspirations since. So you're off by at least an order of magnitude with that 1.5 years. (Then again, while governing is something else, electoral politics is about 100% brand marketing.)
His negotiation skills are more like con-artist skills selling snake oil. Why should anyone on HN regard him as a great entrepreneur who built a great disruptive enterprise that caused many boats to rise on a ride? Shall we compare him with Bezos, Gate, Jobs, or Musk? There’s kind of a bizarre Trump worship that happens among SeekingApha financial types who seem to value pseudo-Alpha male bullying behavior and win at all costs salesmanship even if it screws other people over.
He is not an exemplar of a great businessman or negotiator and if anything his personal skills seem subpar and based purely on a dishonest sales tactics and bullying.
Ross Perot who also ran for the Reform Party Like Trump is a business man deserving of far greater respect based purely on what he had to do.
Moreover do you really think it is hard for a billionaire or pseudo billionaire to marry a former young model?
Honestly, if you can’t tell that Trump lacks serious character traits to be an effective executive I don’t know what to tell you because it seems patently obvious, from the temper tantrums and childish outbursts on Twitter, the excessive personel churn and desire for loyalty over competence, to the inability to focus, stay on message, and apparent severe attention deficit disorder.
Maybe people were hoodwinked in 2016 and really disliked Hillary, but at this point, all the cards and warts are on the table, and if you’re still carrying water from Trump there’s not really any other conclusion to make.
Quote: “The president's personal financial-disclosure report was extensive before he handed the torch to his sons, and listed Trump as a trustee, president, chairman, or member for more than 530 entities. Almost half of these companies listed have Trump's name as part of the company name.”
“President-elect Donald Trump owns a helicopter in Scotland.
To be more precise, he has a revocable trust that owns 99% of a Delaware limited liability company that owns 99% of another Delaware LLC that owns a Scottish limited company that owns another Scottish company that owns the 26-year-old Sikorsky S-76B...”
The Reform Party was created in an attempt (unsuccessful, but that's another story) to institutionalize the relative success of H. Ross Perot’s 1992 independent run, and qualified for federal matching funds in 2000 based on the (lesser) showing of Perot in the 1996 election under the party banner.
Trump, David Duke, and others sought to take advantage of those matching funds by running for the Reform Party nomination in 2000, but Trump’s run wasn't much like Perot’s.
His business acumen is questionable, as he has gone through four bankruptcies. One of those was a friggin casino. Do you know how hard is it to bankrupt a casino?
His negotiating himself out of personal debt amounted to threatening banks that he would declare bankruptcy unless they reduced or forgave his debt. As the saying goes, if you owe the bank $100,000 you have a problem, but if you owe them $100,000,000 they have a problem.
You must have forgotten about his first presidential bid 10 years ago. His MAGA slogan was trademarked in 2012. So his interest in politics isn’t new.
Lastly, I’m not sure how his marrying a “hot former model” has anything to do with... well, anything.
And turning $1 billion into $10 billion is even easier!
I think this meme died 6 months ago. If /s, carry on.
Random scares people away (or into violent opposition), not into line; for punishment to be effective in getting people in line, you want people to be maximally clear on what action will and will not provoke it.