Last article that was talking about Uber I asked why LIDAR wouldn’t have lit up that lady up. The response was “LIDAR might have been disabled”... as if that was any sort of acceptable scenario.
Running without LIDAR, at night especially? If that is true, I can imagine that's why they paid off the family so quickly.
It could be related to the fact that LIDAR tech was supposedly stolen from Waymo.
"Because I was driving with my eyes closed" or "Because I wasn't looking" would be the human equivalent. Imagine if the driver used the same excuse, when asked why she didn't see the pedestrian and take over.
I sneezed.
So motorcyclists here have an acronym "SMIDSY" - stands for "Sorry mate, I didn't see you" - which is almost universally the first words out of a car drivers mouth after they've driven into a motorcycle.
Which is because almost universaly motorbikes move faster than traffic and between lanes. So unless you stare at your rear view mirror constantly you may well miss them aproaching.
Alas, at least here seeing a motorcycle driving at/under speed limit is an exception, not a rule.
Parent poster was talking about car drivers hitting motorcyclists.
You're saying that car drivers don't check their mirrors correctly when manouvering, which to me sounds dangerous.
Not saying I agree, but he leaves room open for other alternatives such as hitting a motorcycle while weaving within a lane. You won't hit a car that way, but you might take out a lane splitting bike.
Sounds believable to me. The human eye doesn't have as broad of a field of view as the brain's post-processing would lead you to believe, so it's very easy for its search pattern to miss small objects.