We, the ones that they'll have to spend undue effort to sniff out a profile about, are not targets to them. We are much too resistant to it that we have gone all through the effort of setting up a private VPN with good encryption.
We, the ones that they'll have to spend undue effort to sniff out a profile about, are not targets to them. We are much too resistant to it that we have gone all through the effort of setting up a private VPN with good encryption.
For example
* On NordVPN through US servers you can't access Amazon (!) Although through Canadian servers you are ok.
* Costco, Apple store, Business Insider, YouTube, google, netflex, dell, consumer reports, ebay - either don't work, or are a pain to make work
* On PureVPN you can't send email - until you have your domain whitelisted
* On PureVPN it's a crap shoot if you get a connection
More detail on experiences with PureVPN and NordVPN are here..
https://www.toytheory.com/?p=295
https://www.toytheory.com/?p=273
https://www.toytheory.com/?p=321
(edit: formatting)
You're right that VPN usage is technically a minority [1], but it is well beyond fringe usage.
[1] https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/304927/Downloads/VPN-Usage-Ar...
1- I did not audit the script myself, and they may have injected various malware to the VPN server it spun up during the setup. I am not concerned enough to not trust them, but I could just read the script thoroughly to eliminate the necessity for trust.
2- DigitalOcean has the access to hardware, so it might be doing whatever while I am not looking, and I just never look. Similarly, I could monitor the activity on the server to assume some control.
I chose DO for being the cheapest ($5/month).
The only company I know of that puts everything in public so to speak is google.
So VPN traffic is very common.