I'd be interested to know who the unnamed sources that fed the false narrative to Bloomberg and the WSJ about it being a SpaceX problem were. (I think those were the originating news organizations, but I may be remembering that wrong.)
This was a month before the Falcon Heavy launch which had a reasonable chance of a spectacular failure. Priming the public to think of SpaceX as a satellite destroyer and then a high profile failure would have been fantastic for United Launch Alliance.
I think it was pretty clear that SpaceX's customers didn't believe it as a SpaceX problem. Subsequent launches were not delayed pending investigation as they were for legitimate failures.
Or maybe it was just sloppy reporting from some guy shooting off his mouth.