Are there any non-browser members as part of the editors or steering committee in the whatwg?
To me, this is giving browser makers even more power over HTML than they have otherwise.
To me, this is giving browser makers even more power over HTML than they have otherwise.
Of course, we have lots of work to do, and if you or anyone else are able to devote a good chunk of time to standards work, we'd love to have more editors---no matter what company they work for.
Browser engine developers comprise the steering group, since ultimately we want the specs to reflect what will be implemented in web browsers, so the best way to resolve disputes about what should be in the spec is by asking the people who will be spending their resources to implement it what they think. I think this is probably the right way to go, instead of "The Director" having the final voice.
Thats actually nice to know, but specifically about HTML (which is one of the most important specs the whatwg works on) it's all browser makers. (That too, majority of them from one particular browser maker).
>I think this is probably the right way to go, instead of "The Director" having the final voice.
I think having a better mix of people in the decision making process than just browser makers would be the right way to go. I understand that browser makers have to implement the specs, but the web community as a whole has to use the specs to build the web of the future - and as such, people from non-browser companies should have a greater say in the final voice.