And since they don't get to control where people move in the United States, they don't actually get to stop change. Change still happens whether they want it or not.
Nobody has the right to stop others from interacting, or renting, or anything like that.
As we don't live in an authoritarian state and we respect individuals' rights, we tend to rely on the market to provide the most fairness. The reason for this is that the market is effectively a democratization of pricing. I don't think it takes a huge degree of empathy to see how some group believe that an individual that believes they should be able to break this democratization of price to force others to enable them to reside wherever they want is what could be called entitled, selfish, and greedy.
I'm not sure how I'm arguing to be able to force others to behave in certain way. I'm against some people being able to punch others; so in that sort of sense, I'm for that sort of controlling others' behavior. But this is no paradox, it's fundamental about what sort of control we're exerting on others.
Is it to increase all our freedom and letting us interact more? Or are we restricting people's behavior to prevent overall freedom?
When a cartel forms, and controls the market, is that regular market behavior? It's certainly to the cartel's benefit, and it's most certainly the natural thing for a cartel to act in its own self interest. But we outlaw that in markets, because they overall greatly restrict markets from operating.
I'm hugely hesitant to view everything from the point of view of markets, but if we were to do that, it's clear that local municipalities are acting as housing cartels on the behalf of a minority of the residents of a community. It's landowners highly constraining the use of land such they benefit and restrict the rest of the market from using land in ways that the cartel disapproves of (for example, multi-unit apartments).
Not "all our" but of certain group.
"your freedom ends where my freedom begins"
What would you say then? When you will have like 10x more problems with overpopulation, crime rising etc.
Oh but new people do that all the time.
"Also, they do not get the right to decide other where people live."
Otherwise, everybody gets to choose on their own where they live, and that is a freedom that I am absolutely loathe to restrict.
Why only this? Let's allow people to do everything they want. /s
Why can't some group of people, living in some area, set what are some rules that should be respected by all members?
BTW. We have too many humans on Earth which causes a global warming.