https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/objectionable_co...
The guidelines refer to "protected characteristics — race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, sex, gender, gender identity, and serious disability or disease."
Under Tier 2 attacks, it bans "Statements of inferiority implying a person's or a group's physical, mental, or moral deficiency."
Several of those protected characteristics -- I'm thinking specifically about religion and sexual orientation -- absolutely have a moral dimension. Religion explicitly deals with morality, and the reason attitudes about sexual orientation have shifted over the last few decades is because views about the morality of gay relationships have shifted.
What I'm wondering is: Would a post criticizing the morality of certain religious adherents violate these standards? Would a post in which someone argues that Obergefell was decided wrongly, and that marriage should be between a man and a woman violate these standards? Would a post in which a person says they believe homosexual acts to be morally wrong violate these standards?