Hacker News Reader

> because it's incredibly limited in scope (...) I doubt it will succeed.

What is the correct amount of scope to ensure success? I'm curious what's the logic behind your comment and negative predictions.

I would say that being legitimately innovative and not exactly like every other ICO with hollow promises would be where I draw the line.

> legitimately innovative > exactly like every other ICO > hollow promises

These are subjective opinions, doesn't seem like a rigorous line.

What are some ICOs you do support?