Hacker News Reader

Intel still fudges their numbers. They just fudge their numbers less than everyone else.

How so?

The numbers don't seem to have much relation at all with all of the real process node numbers.

Even Intel's numbers are just marketing, however.

Everyone is fudging the numbers...

SemiWiki has a good overview of Intel 10nm vs GF 7nm:

https://www.semiwiki.com/forum/content/7191-iedm-2017-intel-...

For a while I think it was the other way around: Intel's processes were, in practice, actually substantially less dense than their competitors at the same nominal process node size.