In Defense of Puns
esquire.com
esquire.com
I don't have a problem with puns, I have a problem with compulsive, unimaginative, lazy punning. You know, like replying "I did nazi that coming" in reply to a comment mentioning the third reich or WW2. Never gets old.
Wordplay is cool, but when one demands everyone’s acknowledgement by stopping the flow of conversation to interject “Pun [not] intended” or “did you see what I did there” it disrespects everyone present.
I think people would do this less if they realized this behavior is the cousin of the person who has to top every story or add the time it happened to them to every discussion.
This isn't a problem unique to puns, but I feel like they do get unfairly punished when talking about overused figures of speech while tired cliches, car analogies that just aren't apt and a ton of mixed metaphors go seemingly unnoticed.
It is indeed impossible to kill a weed which the soil has a natural disposition to produce. The seeds of punning are in the minds of all men, and though they may be subdued by reason, reflection, and good sense, they will be very apt to shoot up in the greatest genius that is not broken and cultivated by the rules of art. Imitation is natural to us, and when it does not raise the mind to poetry, painting, music, or other more noble arts, it often breaks out in puns and quibbles.
..I shall here define it to be a conceit arising from the use of two words that agree in the sound, but differ in the sense. The only way, therefore, to try a piece of wit is to translate it into a different language. If it bear the test, you may pronounce it true; but if it vanish in the experiment you may conclude it to have been a pun. In short, one may say of a pun, as the countryman described his nightingale, that it is a "vox et prczterea nihil"–"a sound, and nothing but a sound."
> When one guy gestured towards his shirt and declared “I’ll be washing tons of clothes later,” his opponent instantly responded, “Better get a tub, man.”
I guess Washingtons is slang for a certain denomination of US dollar bill? But what on earth is tub man? Thanks!
I think...
Seems like there was some plan to but Tubman on the US$20
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-19/tubman-st...
Even after it was explained, I still don’t really remember the claimed plan that they were going to put her on the $20 bill.
And any pun that has to be explained is a failed pun.
It doesn’t even deserve a groan.
But sometimes they are just /so/ good.
And it's so fun when nobody gets it, and then, after a pause, one person gets it and looks at you with the, "Did you just say what I think you said?" look - Awesome. :-)
He explored some of the history of puns and general wordplay, why English is particularly suited for puns (unlike e.g. Romanian as someone else mentioned in this thread), how puns fit into modern and past culture (both the positive and negative bits), as well as some personal anecdotes.
It's a pretty quick and light read, and if you're the type of person that would actually enjoy reading a whole 150+ pages of book about puns, I'd definitely recommend it.
You struck a blushing crow.
Spoonerism. a verbal error in which a speaker accidentally transposes the initial sounds or letters of two or more words, often to humorous effect, as in the sentence you have hissed the mystery lectures, accidentally spoken instead of the intended sentence you have missed the history lectures.
It rarely happens to me anymore, but rare != never.
As described here [3],
> "It's not enough to just substitute a word that sounds the same (aka a 'homophone'); for example, which is funnier, 'Be kind to your dentist because he has fillings too' or 'She ate my breakfast role'? You probably said the first pun, because the meaning of the substitute word also makes sense in the context of the sentence, and it’s this second meaning that actually makes the joke funny."
[1] https://slifty.com/2016/03/a-puntitled-framework-for-evaluat...
[2] Heh.
[3] http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/seriouslyscience/2014/06/1...
The Punderdome is monthly in Brooklyn, NY. Tonight (May 1) at 7pm.
https://www.littlefieldnyc.com/event/1620815-punderdome-broo...
As a non-native speaker I never understood the hate for puns, I've always found them inoffensive fun.
I'm curious whether there are any other languages that are naturally "punny".
I never thought of this before, although I know some Sanskrit (having learned it for some years in school) - but due to its overall design and the fact that words can be built up from other words, and also due to many short words having potentially many meanings (and hence longer words built up from short words, even more so), I think there is probably a lot of scope in Sanskrit for punning. Sanskrit poetry probably has a lot of it, but likely prose too. A very rich and enjoyable language to study, even just for its own sake, i.e. even if you are not studying it in order to understand Indian philosophies, yoga, etc.
There are even entire long poems that are a “pun” — they tell two stories, depending on how you read each verse. Yigal Bronner has written a book about these:
> Extreme Poetry - The South Asian Movement of Simultaneous Narration (2010)
though the book is a bit lighter on examples and heavier on theorizing (the price of academia) than I'd like.
For example, with French, I have found that it is usually the double-entendre which is much more common.
Sarcasm is said to be the lowest form of wit. Or are we considering humour and wit to be independent enough to each have their own league tables in this respect?
While we are on the subject: A pun is it's own reword.
No puns. No joke here.
Now that is some excellent wordplay, whether or not intentional :)
Also: A man! a plan! a canal! Panama!
is a pulindrome.
That leaves the audience with little other than the facile verification of the speaker's wit. Yes, we confirm that word X has a double meaning. The groan is verbal confirmation that the speaker has essentially wasted their time.
Besides, there are other types of low-hanging comedic fruit-- crowd work, street jokes, musical parodies-- which don't get groans. Those typically involve skills other than wit-- like relating to other human beings, improvisation, vulnerability, etc.-- which I think is the reason why.
puns?
1. most people aren't very funny
2. some smart people conflate recognising a reference to some external knowledge with wit
3. not enough people follow Shakespeare's lead and make lots of puns about genitals