Electron Is Cancer | Hacker News Reader

Electron Is Cancer

medium.com

24 pointsapplekicks14 comments

VS Code is the hallmark of electron done well.

Does it use more resources than vim or sublime? Yes.

But it's fast enough to be a workhorse for gobs of devs. And it's core + community development outstrips every other IDE.

Would I prefer saving $20 of RAM? Sure. But what I really like is best in class $LANG support. (In my case, Typescript.)

Why is it that VS Code works well and nothing else does? I just started using VS Code with Python after using Visual Studio almost exclusively for 20 years with C++ and then C#/Typescript/JavaScript.

I actually like VSCode better than PyCharm and I am usually a fan of JetBrains products.

Worth noting that Electron and native apps both only need to run at the frame rate of your monitor, and do the actual work within your users' expected response times.

The quality of your applications is primarily determined by what you care about, not by what tools you build them with.

I liked these kind of articles better when they were called, "X considered harmful"...

> You are not your end-users, and you if you are a developer most likely do not run average hardware.

Well, in that case (Atom) end users were developers.

I believe this is implying that developers take Atom (and other Electron apps) working fine on their computer and believe Electron app products they build will also work fine on any computer their end user may be using. So that particular line doesn't apply to the original "which editor is faster" article, but it does apply to the context of this article.

My counterpoint to the frequent "electron is worse than Hitler and aids combined": what's the alternative? Especially when it comes to commercial software where certain open source licenses are a non-starter and there just aren't a lot of resources for writing desktop apps.

The alternative is to build a native app using a native tool chain like developers have been doing for years....

> there just aren't a lot of resources for writing desktop apps.

Can you elaborate on what you mean by this? I develop primarily for macOS, and I’ve very rarely been unable to find resources for what I need.

As far as alternatives for cross-platform, one possibility in many scenarios is to write your core functionality in a language that can target multiple platforms (e.g. C, C++, Rust, Swift) and then write platform-specific wrappers around it.

(I don’t personally think Electron is the end of humanity, but it does irk me when people call it “native”.)

> Can you elaborate on what you mean by this?

I'm 100% certain the OP meant "resources for writing cross-platform desktop apps".

> write your core functionality in a language that can target multiple platforms...write platform-specific wrappers around it

This is nearly always suggested by someone who has never attempted this.

There is a reason there are mountains of Windows-only or Mac-only software out there.

> This is nearly always suggested by someone who has never attempted this.

Oh, I've done it, and seen it done many times—it all depends on what the application is attempting to do. If the goal is something platform-specific enough that this approach doesn't work well, then something like Electron generally doesn't seem to either.

What's wrong with Visual Studio, or Visual Studio Code, or Code::Blocks, or Eclipse, or... Sublime Text?

Qt?

This article cannot be posted enough. :)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com