This[1] is worth reading.
"Jordan Peterson's popularity is the sign of a deeply impoverished political and intellectual landscape"
[1] https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-d...
"Jordan Peterson's popularity is the sign of a deeply impoverished political and intellectual landscape"
[1] https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-d...
You can figure out for yourself, watch this debate and tell me if Peterson is the type of person described in the article.
I promise I'll read your full article beyond the first paragraph :)
Things are busy at work today, but I'll check it out when I have some time. If you could point me to a shorter clip within the almost 2 hours video, I will be more likely to look at it.
Quite fascinating discussion, like watching a match of intellectual boxing :)
> Jordan Peterson appears very profound and has convinced many people to take him seriously. Yet he has almost nothing of value to say.
The irony of this is that the author himself has nothing of real value to say. (See, I said it so it must be true)