'Condo' isn't really a term we use in London. What's the difference between a condo and an apartment that you own?
'Condo' isn't really a term we use in London. What's the difference between a condo and an apartment that you own?
If you ask if building condos is hard does that mean you think building apartments instead is easier, for example.
“High rise condo” May sound overly specific but it’s just the most common example of a category for which we don’t have a convenient descriptor.
EDIT: That applies to England and Wales (and Northern Ireland?) I believe the law is different in Scotland.
A block of apartments is just a grid of rooms/apartments with nothing else
But if you own and maintain the roof and exterior of your place up to the place where it adjoins to other units, then it's actually a townhome.
Condos are typically a building where all the units in it are owned by their respective tenants.
Apartments are typically a building owned by a Company that rents out all the units, so none of the tenants have any ownership of the place they reside in.
In the UK it would be the equivalent of each flat owner owning a part of the freehold for the building. So in a condo all owners are mutually responsible for the upkeep of the building as whole.
An "apartment" is a flat, it could also be in a "condo", in theory, but is generally used to refer to rented flats.
"Condominium" also implies luxury (and especially new) apartments rather than mid-level or down market or generally older units.
> "Condominium" also implies luxury (and especially new) apartments rather than mid-level or down market or generally older units.
Condo does not have that connotation in my form of English vernacular. There are definitely older or down-market condominiums.
Some suburbs do not allow much apartment construction, but will allow these. They provide a more affordable lodging option that still contributes toward building equity.