Sometimes I think wine could be dumbed down. My best example: Sauv Blanc tastes like grass and bell pepper. Is that universal? No. Does that capture every subtlety? No. But it is the defining characteristic.
Sometimes I think wine could be dumbed down. My best example: Sauv Blanc tastes like grass and bell pepper. Is that universal? No. Does that capture every subtlety? No. But it is the defining characteristic.
I'd like to observe that when you wanted to claim that wines were indistinguishable, you picked two wines that were quite similar. When you wanted to claim beers were distinguishable, you picked chocolate stout vs hefeweizen, which is clearly not the same sort of example.
With beer, everything except pale lager tends to have a distinct flavor of some kind, that can be named easily. Chocolate, wheat, fruit, corn (Keystone), etc.
You have quite an offputting smugness, triggered by such a light and otherwise friendly discussion.
Seriously? Comparing sauvignon blanc and chardonnay to a chocolate stout and a pale lager? Are you intentionally trying to be disingenuous?
For someone with practice (and not a lot of practice), the difference between different wines made from the same grape isn't difficult. A "typical" Australian Chardonnay tastes buttery, while a Chablis is like sucking flint. And years ago I had a Texan Chardonnay that stank like rotting cabbages, yet tasted ... well, more or less the same, but in a good way.
Try a red Bordeaux then a red Cahors.