It is totally correct and in no way misleading to say we need only 100 labeled examples. Anyone can get similar results on their own datasets without even needing to train their own wikitext model, since we've made the pre-trained model available.
(BTW, I see you work at a company that sells something that claims to "categorize SKUs to a standard taxonomy using neural networks." This seems like something you maybe could have mentioned.)
Also, I don't understand the need to be so defensive though and the relevance between my employer and my post?
His response on your employer was likely driven by an assumption that you viewed this as free, open source competition to your product, and thus the negative comment.
To the OP:. I've find a lot of NLP, and this is phenomenal work.