I'm still wishing for a world where all electronics hardware and software is open source. Can't really visualize an industry like that be economically functional, but I hope someone does. My hope is with GNU.
That's what GNU is doing today with their stubborn fights about licensing when there's far bigger problems emerging.
How about a right to privacy? How about a right to timely patches for their Linux-based phones? How about a right to repair hardware running GPL software? How about a right to know if your device has security faults?
I can make software that mines the personal emails of dissidents, runs facial recognition on hacked webcams, and ruins lives, and that's all fine as far as GNU's concerned so long as I give out the source code to anyone who asks.
That seems...problematic.
* https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/03/facebo...
* https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/surveillance-testimony.html
* https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.htm...
* https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/judge-internet-usage.html
* https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/the-danger-of-ebooks.html
* https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/stallmans-law.html
* https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/android-and-users-freedom.htm...
So your position is that GNU should both get rid of Richard Stallman and start addressing this stuff. Clearly, you are not basing this upon Richard Stallman addressing these very things for quite a few years now via the GNU WWW site.
Destroying your phone, not using a web browser, and eating vegan or whatever isn't something everyone can or should do.
If he wants to be some obscure mountain-top philosopher, that's fine, but being the GNU head at the same time is problematic.