Stop spamming every single comment on this thread. Your question is irrelevant and misdirected - I've literally started my argument by saying that "there's currently no case law surrounding GDPR".
You’re also claiming people are rightfully concerned. Where is that right coming from? From past experience? Or is they just baseless concerns?
No, that's not my argument at-all. That's just your personal interpretation of my words.
> "You’re also claiming people are rightfully concerned."
I'm not "also claiming". That was the sole claim from the very start.
> "Where is that right coming from? From past experience? Or is they just baseless concerns?"
It's literally in the comment:
(1) Some elements of the GDPR are up for interpretation.
(2) There's currently no case law surrounding GDPR.
If you take both of these facts into account - it is perfectly plausible for people to be concerned, as there's no telling how things will play out in a court of law.