Theological debates usually end up with the creationist position being that belief without proof equals faith, there for proof is not desired.
Science is skepticism, religion is unquestionable; the two are opposites.
That is not an excuse for avoiding and denying any insight into creation or trying to fill the gap with gods of course. I strongly disagree with the thread starter's sentiment
All that said, reading Jordan Peterson’s book has increased my opinion of the Bible and the knowledge about the human condition that it contains, but as an allegory, not a literal history.