Hacker News Reader

Comment by lovich | Hacker News Reader

Why? This seems like good behavior. They're original product is supported by a business model that relies on user data. Now they are offering a similar product that doesn't make money off of user data but instead charges the user. I am all for the GPDR, but the regulations don't say you can't suck up all user data _and_ you still have to provide your service for free/discounted

View on HN

I work for a competitor to sendwithus, and, while I can't speak to specifics or the industry as a whole, I can definitely say that it is proven possible to run a company whose revenue model is to charge something comparable to sendwithus's previous monthly subscription fees, be profitable, grow steadily, and not make a single dime on the side selling data to advertisers.

So you're saying user's data is worth $23052 per year?

User data could or could not be worth that much. Having a team of programmers implementing and maintaining features that make the software GDPR compliant is perhaps the biggest contributing factor the price increase

Maybe, maybe not. If it's not I assume they'll be forced to lower their prices and go out of business. I don't have a problem with a company charging money for their product though.

The GDPR appears to be doing its job here because it's forcing a company out of a business model that is unethical and into one that's better for society, regardless of it's better or not for the company and some of its customers

No, that is just the cost of compliance.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com